Writing-based wordforms vs. spoken wordforms

Authors

  • Vadim Kasevich Saint Petersburg State University, Russia Author
  • Iuliia Menshikova Saint Petersburg State University, Russia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36505/ExLing-2016/07/0015/000274

Keywords:

linguistics, Russian language, grammar, phonetics, morphemics

Abstract

This study addresses a very important problem of reshaping Russian Grammar in conformity with its real acoustic realization rather than with the traditionally written expression plane. In this way, one can switch from an absolutely abstract coding of wordforms to acoustic entities, first phonological and then phonetic, which underlie the real processes of speech production and speech perception. The multiple approach to grammar writing makes it necessary to develop a special database for the phonologically represented wordforms of Russian. Typically, the respective paradigms are reduced. More generally, the links camouflaged by the traditional orthography are made visible. E.g., the Adjective Gender paradigm, normally made up of three genders, is reduced to a two-item paradigmatic structure, because Neuter Gender and Feminine Gender just merge.

 

References

audouin de Courtenay J.A. 1912. On the Relation of Russian Writing to the Russian Language. In Baudouin de Courtenay J.A. Selected Works on General Linguistics, Vol. 2, 209-235. Moscow.

Shcherba L.V. 1957. Baudouin de Courtenay and His Contributions to Linguistic Studies. In Shcherba L.V. Selected Papers on the Russian Language, 85-96. Moscow.

Hockett Charles F. 1961. Grammar for the hearers. In Structure of language and its mathematical aspects. In Proceedings of symposia in applied mathematics, vol. 12, 220-236.

Downloads

Published

01-01-2016

How to Cite

Writing-based wordforms vs. spoken wordforms. (2016). Linguistic Proceedings Series, 7(1), 75-78. https://doi.org/10.36505/ExLing-2016/07/0015/000274

Similar Articles

1-10 of 355

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.