Disagreement as an interactional resource for affiliation in South Korean conversation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36505/TheLinguisticProceedings/2025/17/02/006/000692Keywords:
disagreement, South Korean conversation, conversation analysis, preference organizationAbstract
This study investigates how South Korean speakers employ expressions of disagreement to promote social solidarity and convey affiliation. Using a conversation-analytic (CA) approach, it examines expressions of disagreement in naturally occurring Korean conversation drawn from the LDC CallFriend Korean telephone corpus. Prior CA research has generally treated disagreement as a dispreferred action, typically associated with resistance, opposition, or rejection in conflictual contexts. The present study explores how disagreement can be interactionally mobilized as a preferred action in South Korean conversation. By foregrounding the affiliative uses of disagreement in a specific cultural context, this study contributes to a more nuanced understanding of disagreement as a culturally variable and socially adaptive interactional resource.References
Ha, K. 2018a. The social actions of the sentence-ending suffixes -ney, -ci, and -kwuna in Korean conversation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
Ha, K. 2018b. Native and non-native speakers’ expression of disagreement in Korean conversation. The International Journal of Korean Language Education, 4(2), 29-48.
Heritage, J. 2012. Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1), 1-29.
Mori, J. 1999. Negotiating agreement and disagreement in Japanese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Pomerantz, A. 1984. Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In Atkinson, M., Heritage, J. (eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, 57-103. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, E.A. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sidnell, J. 2010. Conversation Analysis: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell-Wiley.
Speer, S.A. 2019. Reconsidering self-deprecation as a communication practice. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(4), 806-828.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
