Prosodic variation in L2: a case of Germans speaking English
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36505/ExLing-2008/02/0006/000065Keywords:
prosodic variation, second language acquisition, anguage ability, F0 contourAbstract
The present study investigates prosodic variation as realized by L2 speakers of varying pronunciation ability in comparison with native speakers of English. The results demonstrate the distribution of the rising contours on both the phonological (ToBI frequencies) and phonetic (values for six parameters of the F0 curve) levels. The rising contours and pitch accents have a wider distribution in German productions, and are therefore closer to the German prosodic pattern, as opposed to the native realizations. Another peculiarity concerns the F0 peak frequency parameter in L*H accents as realized by the below-average informants. Their values are significantly different from those of the native and average speakers. Further phonetic differences are to be tested for consistency effects on the subsequent research stages.
References
Anderson, K. O. 1979. On the contrastive phonetics of English and German intonation. Festschrift für Otto von Essen anlässlich seines 80. Geburtstages. In H-H. Wängler (ed.), Hamburger Phonetische Beiträge 25, 25-35
Bent T. 2005. Perception and Production of Non-Native Prosodic Categories. Doctoral Dissertation, Northwestern University
Klein W. and Perdue C. 1997. The Basic Variety (or: Couldn't natural languages be much simpler?), Second Language Research 13,4; pp. 301 - 347
Lacerda F. 1995. The Perceptual-magnet effect: an emergent consequence of exemplar-based phonetic memory. Proceedings of the XIIIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Stockholm, vol.2, pp. 140-147
Möhler G. 2001. Improvements of the PaIntE model for F0 parametrization. Research Papers from the Phonetics Lab, AIMS Universität Stuttgart.
Möhler G. and Mayer J. 2001. A Discourse model for pitch-range control. 4th ISCA Workshop on Speech Synthesis Perthshire, Scotland.
Ueyama M. 2000. Prosodic Transfer: An Acoustic Study of L2 Japanese & L2 English. Doctoral Dissertation, UCLA.
Ullakonoja R. 2007. Comparison of pitch range in Finnish (L1) and in Russian (L2). Proceedings of the XVIth Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Saarbrücken, pp. 1701-1704
Wade T., Jongman A. and Sereno J. 2007. Effects of acoustic variability in the perceptual learning of non-native-accented speech sounds. Phonetica, vol. 64, pp. 122-144.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
