Experimentally comparing the learnability of rule interactions

Authors

  • Yuxuan (Melody) Wang Harvard University, US , University College London, UK Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36505/ExLing-2023/14/0029/000623

Keywords:

Opacity, AGL, Learnability, Natural bias

Abstract

This paper aims to test the claim that opaque interactions are harder to learn than transparent ones with artificial grammar learning (AGL) experiments and the ‘poverty-of-stimulus’ paradigm. The participants were first taught vowel harmony and palatalisation separately and then tested on whether they preferred to let them feed or counterfeed in ambiguous environments. If transparent interactions are indeed preferred, significantly more subjects should choose the feeding option. Results indicated that significantly more participants preferred the opaque interaction instead, contrary to predictions. Preference for opacity might be attributed to structural simplicity or a dispreference for the application of the palatalisation rule.

References

Baković, E. 2011. Opacity and ordering. In Goldsmith, J., Yu, A., Riggle, J. (eds.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory (2nd ed.), 40-67. Oxford: Blackwell.

Brooks, K. M., Pajak, B., Baković, E. 2013. Learning biases for phonological interactions. The 2013 Annual Meeting on Phonology. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

Ettlinger, M. 2008. Input-driven Opacity. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.

Hayes, B. 2004. Phonological acquisition in optimality theory: The early stages. In Kager, R., Pater, J., Zonneveld, W. (eds.), Fixing Priorities: Constraints in Phonological Acquisition, 158-203. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kim, Y. J. 2012. Do learners prefer transparent rule ordering? An artificial language learning study. In Beltrama, A., Chatzikonstantinou, T., Lee, J. L., Pham, M., Rak, D. (eds.), Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the CLS, 375-386. Chicago, USA.

Kiparsky, P. 1976. Abstractness, opacity, and global rules. In Koutsoudas, A. (ed.), The Ordering and Application of Rules. Mouton.

Pater, J., Moreton, E. 2012. Structurally biased phonology: Complexity in learning and typology. In Vijayakrishnan, K. G. (ed.), A Special Issue of the EFL Journal on Phonology, 1-44.

Downloads

Published

01-01-2023

How to Cite

Experimentally comparing the learnability of rule interactions. (2023). Linguistic Proceedings Series, 14, 113-116. https://doi.org/10.36505/ExLing-2023/14/0029/000623

Share

Similar Articles

1-10 of 34

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.