‘Seeing and thinking for speaking’ across languages: spatial encoding and attention allocation in agrammatic aphasia

Authors

  • Efstathia Soroli Structures Formelles du Langage Lab, CNRS & University of Paris 8, France Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36505/ExLing-2012/05/0028/000234

Keywords:

spatial language, eye movements, agrammatism

Abstract

Current typological research has shown that languages encode space in strikingly different ways, mapping spatial concepts onto divergent lexical and syntactic structures. These typological properties seem to strongly guide speakers’ "speaking" and "thinking" in both typical and atypical (pathological) contexts. Such asymmetries in the distribution of lexical and grammatical elements are also particularly interesting for the study of agrammatic speakers, who frequently show dissociations between these two elements when speaking. The present research investigates whether language-specific factors influence how speakers of typologically different languages, both with and without agrammatism, encode motion events verbally (speaking), as well as how they allocate their visual attention (seeing) when constructing spatial representations (thinking).

References

Evans, N. and Levinson, S. C. 2009. The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. *Behavioral and Brain Sciences*, 32(5), 429–448.

Hickmann, M., Taranne, P. and Bonnet, P. 2009. Motion in first language acquisition: Manner and path in French and in English. *Journal of Child Language*, 36(4), 705–741.

Menn, L. and Obler, L. K. 1990. Cross-language data and theories of agrammatism. In L. Menn and L. K. Obler (eds.), *Agrammatic Aphasia: A Cross-Language Narrative Sourcebook*, 1369–1388. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Nespoulous, J.-L. 1999. Universal vs. language-specific constraints in agrammatic aphasia. In C. Fuchs and S. Robert (eds.), *Language Diversity and Cognitive Representation*, 195–207. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Slobin, D. I. 1996. From "thought and language" to "thinking for speaking". In J. J. Gumperz and S. C. Levinson (eds.), *Rethinking Linguistic Relativity*, 70–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Soroli, E. 2011. *Language and spatial cognition in French and in English: Crosslinguistic perspectives in aphasia*. Doctoral dissertation, University of Paris 8.

Soroli, E. and Hickmann, M. 2010. Language and spatial representations in French and in English: Evidence from eye-movements. In G. Marotta, A. Lenci, L. Meini and F. Rovai (eds.), *Space in Language: Proceedings of the Pisa International Conference*, 581–597. Pisa: ETS.

Soroli, E., Sahraoui, H. and Sacchett, C. 2012. Linguistic encoding in English and French: Typological constraints on second language acquisition and agrammatic aphasia. *Language, Interaction and Acquisition*, 3(1), 109–133.

Talmy, L. 2000. *Toward a Cognitive Semantics* (Vol. 2: *Typology and Process in Concept Structuring*). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Downloads

Published

01-01-2012

How to Cite

‘Seeing and thinking for speaking’ across languages: spatial encoding and attention allocation in agrammatic aphasia. (2012). Linguistic Proceedings Series, 5(1), 113-116. https://doi.org/10.36505/ExLing-2012/05/0028/000234

Share

Similar Articles

1-10 of 242

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.