What’s wrong with Gricean pragmatics

Authors

  • Bart Geurts Department of Philosophy, Radboud University, Netherlands Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36505/ExLing-2019/10/0001/000363

Keywords:

Gricean pragmatics, mentalism, communicative intentions

Abstract

The view that human communication is essentially a matter of sharing mental states, especially communicative intentions, has been immensely influential in pragmatics and beyond. Drawing together and elaborating various lines of criticism, I argue that this influence has been mostly harmful; in particular, it has misdirected research on the evolution and development of language and communication.

 

References

Brandom, R. 1994. Making it explicit. Harvard University Press.

Geurts, B. 2019. Communication as commitment sharing: speech acts, implicatures, common ground. Theoretical linguistics 45, 1–30.

Geurts, B. (in preparation). First saying, then believing: the social roots of folk psychology.

Geurts, B., Kissine, M., and van Tiel, B. 2019. Pragmatic reasoning in autism. In: Morsanyi, K. and Byrne, R. (eds.), Thinking, reasoning and decision making in autism, 113–134. Routledge.

Grice, H. P. 1957. Meaning. Philosophical review 66, 377–388.

Jary, M. 2010. Assertion and false-belief attribution. Pragmatics and cognition 18, 17–39.

Moore, R. 2017. Gricean communication and cognitive development. Philosophical quarterly 67, 303–326.

Origgi, G. and Sperber, D. 2000. Evolution, communication and the proper function of language. In: Carruthers, P. and Chamberlain, A. (eds.), Evolution and the human mind, 140–169.

Rakoczy, H. and Behne, T. 2019. Commitment sharing as crucial step towards a developmentally plausible speech act theory? Theoretical linguistics 45, 93–97.

Scott-Phillips, T. 2015. Speaking our minds. Palgrave Macmillan.

Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 2002. Pragmatics, modularity and mind-reading. Mind and language 17, 3–23.

Sterelny, K. 2018. Language: from how-possibly to how-probably? In: Joyce, R. (ed.), The Routledge handbook of evolution and philosophy, 120–135.

van Cleave, M. and Gauker, C. 2010. Linguistic practice and false-belief tasks. Mind and language 25, 298–328.

Downloads

Published

01-01-2019

How to Cite

What’s wrong with Gricean pragmatics. (2019). Linguistic Proceedings Series, 10(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.36505/ExLing-2019/10/0001/000363

Share

Similar Articles

1-10 of 18

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.