Comprehension of verb directionality in LIS and LSF

Authors

  • Valentina Aristodemo Laboratoire Linguistique Formelle, Université de Paris, France Author
  • Beatrice Giustolisi Department of Psychology, University of Milan-Bicocca, Italy Author
  • Carlo Cecchetto Department of Psychology, University of Milan-Bicocca, Italy; UMR 7023 Structures Formelles du Langage, Université Paris 8, France Author
  • Caterina Donati Laboratoire Linguistique Formelle, Université de Paris, France Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36505/ExLing-2020/11/0008/000423

Keywords:

agreement, directional verbs, sign language, age of exposure, Italian, French

Abstract

The present work reports the findings of a comprehension task investigating verb directionality in Italian Sign Language (LIS) and French Sign Language (LSF), evaluating both native and non-native signers. Our goals were threefold: to study the effects of the age of first-language exposure on the comprehension of verb agreement in LIS and LSF; to verify whether a significant performance gap exists between processing forward and backward directionality; and to determine if our data can offer fresh insights into the underlying nature (gestural versus linguistic) of verb directionality in sign languages. In both languages, the results reveal that the ability to comprehend verb agreement is significantly diminished in non-native signers, indicating that delayed first-language exposure has long-lasting cognitive effects that persist into adulthood. Ultimately, we argue that these outcomes strongly support structural analyses of verb agreement as a fully grammaticalized linguistic phenomenon.

References

Cormier, K., Schembri, A., Vinson, D., & Orfanidou, E. 2012. First language acquisition differs from second language acquisition in prelingually deaf signers: Evidence from sensitivity to grammaticality judgements in British Sign Language. Cognition, 124(1), 50-65.

Emmorey, K., Bellugi, U., Friederici, A., & Horn, P. 1995. Effects of age of acquisition on grammatical sensitivity: Evidence from American Sign Language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 16(1), 1-23.

Liddell, S.K. 1995. Real, surrogate, and token space: Grammatical consequences in ASL. In K. Emmorey & J.S. Reilly (eds.), Language, Gesture, and Space, 19-41. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Padden, C.A. 1998. The ASL lexicon. Sign Language & Linguistics, 1(1), 39-60.

Pfau, R., Salzmann, M., & Steinbach, M. 2018. The syntax of sign language agreement: Common ingredients, but unusual recipe. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 3(1), 107.

Downloads

Published

01-01-2020

How to Cite

Comprehension of verb directionality in LIS and LSF. (2020). Linguistic Proceedings Series, 11(1), 33-36. https://doi.org/10.36505/ExLing-2020/11/0008/000423

Share

Similar Articles

1-10 of 318

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.