Sensitivity to classifier relation in a priming task

Authors

  • Jiahuan Zhang The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong , The University of Cambridge, United Kingdom Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36505/ExLing-2023/14/0030/000624

Keywords:

Chinese classifiers, Classifier effect, Mediated priming, Linguistic sensitivity, Conceptual structure, Linguistic relativity

Abstract

Chinese speakers were often found to show sensitivity to classifier rules and semantics through the lens of cognitive processing tasks, which is the purported “classifier effect”. However, it remains unclear whether the classifier effect is reflective of linguistic sensitivity or universal conceptual structuring. To scrutinise this, a linguistically implicit mediated priming task was administered to assess differences in sensitivity to information contained within classifier-related pairs. Results showed that Chinese (n = 35, female = 29, Mage = 24.16, SD = 2.58, age range: 18-31) and English (n = 35, female = 26, Mage = 22.31, SD = 2.71, age range: 19-28) L1 speaker groups both produced more “yes” responses on semantic pair trials when being asked to decide whether the prime and the target were associated with each other. Although both L1 groups performed comparably in responses under all task conditions, it only took Chinese speakers longer to determine grammatical pairs than English speakers. Findings together support an “implicit classifier effect” from Chinese speakers’ performance.

References

Grüter, T., Lau, E., Ling, W. 2020. How classifiers facilitate predictive processing in L1 and L2 Chinese: The role of semantic and grammatical cues. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 35(2), 221-234. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2019.1648840

Leung, J. H., Williams, J. N. 2014. Crosslinguistic differences in implicit language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36(4), 733-755.

Speed, L. J., Chen, J., Huettig, F., Majid, A. 2021. Classifier categories reflect but do not affect conceptual organization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 47(4), 625-640.

Tsang, C., Chambers, C. G. 2011. Appearances aren't everything: Shape classifiers and referential processing in Cantonese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(5), 1065.

Zhang, H. 2007. Numeral classifiers in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 16(1), 43-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-006-9006-9

Downloads

Published

01-01-2023

How to Cite

Sensitivity to classifier relation in a priming task. (2023). Linguistic Proceedings Series, 14, 117-120. https://doi.org/10.36505/ExLing-2023/14/0030/000624

Share

Similar Articles

1-10 of 318

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.