Does uncertainty effect the case of exhaustive interpretation?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36505/ExLing-2008/02/0059/000118Keywords:
exhaustive interpretation, focus detection, uncertainty, intonation, question-answering congruityAbstract
We present an experimental study investigating the role of intonation as a prosodic indicator of uncertainty as well as question-answering congruity for the exhaustive interpretation of answers. We vary intonation for expressing intended (un)certainty and also the type of question. Interpretation is tested by using pictures illustrating (non-)exhaustivity in order to avoid that the subjects' linguistic awareness is focussed on the tested question.
References
Groenendijk, J. and Stokhof, M. 1984. Studies on the Semantics of Questions and the Pragmatics of Answers. Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Rooth, M. 1992. A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics, 1(1), 75-116.
Smith, V. and Clark, H. H. 1993. On the course of answering questions. Journal of Memory and Language, 32(1), 25-38.
Swerts, M., Krahmer, E., Barkhuysen, P. and van de Laar, L. 2003. Audiovisual cues to uncertainty. Proceedings of the ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop on Error Handling in Spoken Dialogue Systems, Château-d'Oex, Switzerland.
van Rooij, R. and Schulz, K. 2006. Pragmatic meaning and non-monotonic reasoning: The case of exhaustive interpretation. Linguistics and Philosophy, 29(2), 205-250.
Ward, G. and Hirschberg, J. 1985. Implicating uncertainty: The pragmatics of fall-rise intonation. Language, 61(4), 747-776.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2008 Charlotte Wollermann (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
