Subject gaps in German coordinative structures — Empirical evidence for a gradient phenomenon
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36505/ExLing-2011/04/0008/000177Keywords:
magnitude estimation, ellipsis, coordination, gradience, descriptive grammar of GermanAbstract
In this article, we investigate German complex clauses containing a subject gap using the empirical method of Magnitude Estimation. We will present evidence for the fact that subject gaps in coordinative structures can be characterized by (i) gradience and (ii) regional distinctiveness. Against the background of the recent critical discussion of Magnitude Estimation (e.g., Featherston 2008), we show that this method qualifies to test the hierarchical graduation of acceptability.
References
Bard, E. G., Robertson, D. and Sorace, A. 1996. Magnitude Estimation of Linguistic Acceptability. Language, 72(1), 32–68.
Cowart, W. 1997. Experimental Syntax: Applying Objective Methods to Sentence Judgments. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dudenredaktion (ed.) 2009. Duden: Die Grammatik (8th edn). Mannheim: Dudenverlag.
Fanselow, G. 1990. Minimale Syntax. Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik (GAGL), 32.
Featherston, S. 2008. Thermometer judgements as linguistic evidence. In C. M. Riehl and A. Rothe (eds.), Was ist linguistische Evidenz?, 69–89. Aachen: Shaker.
Hartmann, K. 1994. Zur Koordination von V-2 Sätzen. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 13(1), 3–19.
Höhle, T. N. 1983. Subjektlücken in Koordinationen. Unpublished manuscript, University of Tübingen. URL: www.linguistik.uni-tuebingen.de/hoehle/manuskripte/SLF-W5.1_neu.pdf.
McGee, M. 2003. Usability Magnitude Estimation. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 47th Annual Meeting, 691–695. Santa Monica, CA: HFES.
Reich, I. 2009. Asymmetrische Koordination im Deutschen. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
Schütze, C. T. 1996. The Empirical Base of Linguistics: Grammaticality Judgments and Linguistic Methodology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
