On the syntactic symmetry of coordinate structures

Authors

  • Adam Przepiórkowski Author
  • Katarzyna Kuś Author
  • Agnieszka Patejuk Author
  • Berke Şenşekerci Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36505/ExLing-2024/15/0027/000652

Keywords:

coordinate structures, symmetry of coordination, Thermometer Method, acceptability judgement task

Abstract

This paper examines the syntax of coordinate structures, focusing on the debate between asymmetric and symmetric approaches. Asymmetric theories argue that the first conjunct heads the coordination and determines its distribution. They seem to be supported by examples where predicates like annoy and depend govern mixed-category coordinations (e.g., NP and CP). Through acceptability judgement experiments, we challenge this argument on the basis of an alternative analysis where such structures involve a coordination of a PP and a CP. Using the Thermometer Method, we find that 2 out of 8 tested predicates (e.g., annoyed) accept CP complements as readily as PP complements, while others show reduced acceptability but not outright ungrammaticality. Additionally, the difference in acceptability between purportedly grammatical PP&CP coordinations and ungrammatical CP alone is marginal. These results debunk a key argument for asymmetric theories and provide empirical support for symmetric approaches to coordination.

References

de Marneffe, M.-C., Manning, C.D., Nivre, J., Zeman, D. 2021. Universal Dependencies. Computational Linguistics 47(2), 255–308.

Featherston, S. 2008. Thermometer judgements as linguistic evidence. In Riehl, C. M., Rothe, A. (eds.), Was ist linguistische Evidenz?, 69–90. Aachen, Shaker Verlag.

Featherston, S. 2009. A scale for measuring well-formedness: Why syntax needs boiling and freezing points. In Featherston, S., Winkler, S. (eds.), The Fruits of Empirical Linguistics. Volume 1: Process, 47–73. Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter.

Gerbrich, H., Schreier, V., Featherston, S. 2019. Standard items for English judgment studies: Syntax and semantics. In Featherston, S., Hörnig, R., von Wietersheim, S., Winkler, S. (eds.), Experiments in Focus: Information Structure and Semantic Processing, 305–327. Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter.

Juzek, Tom. S. 2015. Acceptability judgement tasks and grammatical theory. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Oxford.

Munn, A.B. 1993. Topics in the Syntax and Semantics of Coordinate Structures. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Maryland.

Neeleman, A., Philip, J., Tanaka, M., van de Koot, H. 2023. Subordination and binary branching. Syntax 26, 41–84.

Przepiórkowski, A. 2022. Coordination of unlike grammatical cases (and unlike categories). Language 98, 592–634.

Sag, I.A., Gazdar, G., Wasow, T., Weisler, S. 1985. Coordination and how to distinguish categories. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3(2), 117–171.

Zhang, N.N. 2009. Coordination in Syntax. Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Published

01-01-2024

How to Cite

On the syntactic symmetry of coordinate structures. (2024). Linguistic Proceedings Series, 15, 105-108. https://doi.org/10.36505/ExLing-2024/15/0027/000652

Share

Similar Articles

1-10 of 131

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.