Elliptical appendices of relative clauses (EARs)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36505/ExLing-2024/15/0028/000653Keywords:
ellipsis, relativization, acceptability, response time experiment, illusionAbstract
This investigation is about the observation that certain relative clauses in German show peculiar appendices, involving an obligatory subject gap and lacking syntactic integration. The question raised here is whether these strings should be conceived of as an output of mental grammar or rather as systematic mistakes. This second notion would be plausible if a range of examples is poorly accepted in a controlled setting. Therefore, I conducted an experiment, more precisely: a pseudo response time experiment, based on real instances of the structure. In fact, the examples achieved quite high acceptance rates so that they cannot easily be dismissed as mere mistakes. They might, however, still represent grammatical illusions. It will be argued that they are not, leaving an inner-grammatical status of the structure as the only possibility.
References
Haider, H. 2011. Grammatische Illusionen. Lokal wohlgeformt – global deviant. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 30(2), 223–257.
Meinunger, A. 2023. Unexpected finite verb forms in German: Cases of grammatical illusion? Linguistische Berichte (Special issue 34), 205–230.
Reich, I. 2009. “Asymmetrische Koordination” im Deutschen (Studien zur Deutschen Grammatik 75). Tübingen, Stauffenburg.
Reiner, T. in prep. An old analysis of ellipsis applied to new observations [working title].
Seiler, G. 2015. Syntactization, analogy and the distinction between proximate and evolutionary causations. In Adli, A., García García, M.,Kaufmann, G. (eds.) 2015, Variation in language: System- and usage-based approaches (Linguae & Litterae 50), 239–264. Berlin, De Gruyter.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.