Processing Russian inflectional morphology: A PET study of verb generation

Authors

  • Tatiana Chernigovskaya St. Petersburg State University, Russia Author
  • Kira Gor University of Maryland, USA Author
  • Galina Kataeva The Institute of the Human Brain, Russian Academy of Sciences Author
  • Alexander Korotkov The Institute of the Human Brain, Russian Academy of Sciences Author
  • Maxim Kireev The Institute of the Human Brain, Russian Academy of Sciences Author
  • Kristina Memetova The Institute of the Human Brain, Russian Academy of Sciences Author
  • Svyatoslav Medvedev The Institute of the Human Brain, Russian Academy of Sciences Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36505/ExLing-2011/04/0014/000183

Keywords:

morphology, anterior cingulate cortex, error detection system

Abstract

For many years, acquisition of verbal morphology has been an issue of much debate within linguistic theory, research on first and second language acquisition, mental grammar representation, and cognitive processing. The proponents of the Dual Mechanism account claim that regularly inflected forms are computed by a rule-processing system, while morphologically irregular forms are processed in associative memory. The opposite Single Mechanism account claims that both regular and irregular forms are processed in associative memory. In the present PET study significant rCBF increase in the anterior cingulate gyrus of the left hemisphere (24 BA) was shown for regular verb generation.This may support the rule-based (de)compositional account.

 

References

Arndt, S., Cizadlo, T., O'Leary, D., Gold, S., Andreasen, N.C. 1996. Normalizing counts and cerebral blood flow intensity in functional imaging studies of the human brain. NeuroImage, 3, 175-184.

Bechtereva, N.P., Gretchin, V.B. 1968. Physiological foundations of mental activity. Int. Rev. Neurobiol., 11, 329-352

Bechtereva, N.P., Shemyakina, N.V., Starchenko, M.G., Danko, S.G., Medvedev, S.V. 2005. Error detectors mechanisms of the brain: background and prospects. Intern. J. of Psychophysiology, 58, 227-234.

Démonet, J.F., Thierry, G., Cardebat, D. 2005. Renewal of the neurophysiology of language: functional neuroimaging. Physiol Rev., 85, 49-95.

Chandler, S., Skousen, R. 1997. Analogical modeling and the English past tense: a reply to Jaeger et. al. 1996

Chernigovskaya, T., Gor, K. 2001. The Complexity of Paradigm and Input Frequencies in Native and Second Language Verbal Processing: Evidence from Russian. Language and Language Behavior, 3 (II), 20-37.

Gor, K. 2010. Beyond the obvious: Do second language learners process inflectional morphology? Language Learning, 60.1, 1-20.

Jaeger, J., Lockwood, D., Kemmerer, R., Van Valin, R., Murphy, R., Kahlak, H. 1996. A positron emission tomography study of regular and irregular verb morphology in English. Language. 72. 451–497.

Kataeva, G.V. and Korotkov, A.D. 2007 The regional cerebral blood flow pattern of the normal human brain and its factor structure. Human Physiology, 33.4, 383-387

Maldjian, J.A., Laurienti, P.J., Kraft, R.A., Burdette, J.H., 2003. An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based interrogation of fmri data sets. NeuroImage, 19, 1233– 1239.

Mathalon, D.H., Whitfield, S.L., Ford, J.M. 2003. Anatomy of an error: ERP and fMRI. Biolog. Psychol., 64, 119-141.

Sidtis D. 2006. Does functional neuroimaging solve the questions of neurolinguistics? Brain Lang., 98, 276-90.

Downloads

Published

01-01-2011

How to Cite

Processing Russian inflectional morphology: A PET study of verb generation. (2011). Linguistic Proceedings Series, 4(1), 59-62. https://doi.org/10.36505/ExLing-2011/04/0014/000183

Share

Similar Articles

11-20 of 75

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.