L2 Greek morphological agreement

Authors

  • Sviatlana Karpava Department of English Studies, University of Cyprus, Cyprus Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36505/ExLing-2011/04/0021/000190

Keywords:

L2 acquisition, morphological agreement

Abstract

This is a study of morphological agreement in L2 Greek verbal and nominal domains by L1 Russian, Bulgarian, and Turkish speakers, with various features such as person, number, gender, and case involved, following Tsimpli et al. 2005. Russian, Bulgarian, and Greek are similar in terms of phi-feature agreement, but different from Turkish. A further distinction will be made for the L2 Greek, between Standard Modern Greek and Cypriot Greek. The analysis of the oral interviews shows that gender, an uninterpretable feature that lacks semantic content (Tsimpli 2004, Franceshina 2001), was the most problematic feature for non-native speakers of Greek, both in the verbal and in the nominal domain. L2 learners either relied on phonological agreement or used the default neuter gender.

References

Franceschina, F. 2001. Against an L2 morphological deficit as an explanation for the differences between native and non-native grammars. EUROSLA Yearbook 1, 143-158.

Grohmann, K. K. 2011. Some directions for the systematic investigation of the acquisition of Cypriot Greek: A new perspective on production abilities from object clitic placement. In Rinke, E. and Kupisch, T. (eds.), The Development of Grammar: Language acquisition and diachronic change. 2011,179–203.

Haznedar, B. and Schwartz, B.D. 1997. Are there optional infinitives in child L2 acquisition? In Hughes, Hughes, M., and Greenhill, A. (eds.) Proc. of the 21st Annual BUCLD. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 257-268.

Lardiere, D. 2005. On morphological competence. In Dekydtspotter, L., Sprouse, R., and Liljestrand, A. (eds.), Proc. of the 7th GASLA Conference (GASLA 2004), Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 178-192.

Neeleman, Ad., Szendroi, K.2007. Radical pro drop and the morphology of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry, 38, 671-714.

Prévost, P. and White, L. 2000. Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research 16, 103-133.

Smith, N. and Tsimpli, I.M. 1995. The Mind of a Savant: Language Learning and Modularity. Oxford: Blackwell.

Terzi, Arhonto (1999)"Cypriot Greek clitics and their positioning restrictions". In A. Alexiadou, G. Horrocks and M. Stavrou (eds.) Studies in Greek Syntax. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 227-240.

Tsimpli, I.M., Roussou, A., Fotiadou, G., and Dimitrakopoulou, M. in press. The syntax/morphology interface: Agree relations in L1 Slavic/L2 Greek. In Tsoulas, G. and Galani, A. (eds.), Proc. of the 7th International Conference on Greek Linguistics, 2005, York, England.

Tsimpli, I.M., Sorace, A., Heycock, C, Filiaci, F. 2004. First language attrition and syntactic subjects: A study of Greek and Italian near-native speakers of English. International Journal of Bilingualism 8, 257-277.

Downloads

Published

01-01-2011

How to Cite

L2 Greek morphological agreement. (2011). Linguistic Proceedings Series, 4(1), 87-90. https://doi.org/10.36505/ExLing-2011/04/0021/000190

Share

Similar Articles

1-10 of 114

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.