Acoustic and semantic processes during speech segmentation in French
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36505/ExLing-2021/12/0014/000487Keywords:
speech segmentation, sentence processing, acoustic cues, ERPAbstract
We designed two experiments that tested the listeners’ perceptual capacities during online segmentation of homophonic word boundaries while processing sentential information. In French, listeners often use variations in fine acoustic indices to detect word beginnings. We measured event-related potentials (ERPs) evoked by phonemically identical sequences, such as l’affiche (“the poster”) and la fiche (“the sheet”), both [lafiʃ], which were contained in either congruent or incongruent sentences. Results showed that although listeners can detect acoustic variations in homophonic sequences, these may not be salient enough when contextual information is also present. Shifting attention from sentence meaning (Task 1) to lexical information (Task 2), enhanced the listeners’ perception of fine-grained acoustic details. Thus, top-down processes are likely to modulate speech perception and segmentation.
References
Davis, M. H., & Rodd, J. M. (2011). Brain structures underlying lexical processing of speech: Evidence from brain imaging. In G. Gaskell & P. Zwitserlood (Eds.), Lexical Representation: A Multidisciplinary Approach (pp. 197-230). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Do Carmo-Blanco, N., et al. (2019). Processing of non-contrastive subphonemic features in French homophonous utterances: An MMN study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 52.
Friederici, A. D., & Wessels, J. M. I. (1993). Phonotactic knowledge of word boundaries and its use in infant speech perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 54, 287-295.
Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 621-647.
Lehmann, D., & Skrandies, W. (1980). Reference-free identification of components of checkerboard evoked multichannel potentials fields. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 48, 609-621.
Mattys, S. L. (2003). Stress-based speech segmentation revisited. In Proceedings of Eurospeech: The 8th Annual Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (pp. 121-124). Geneva, Switzerland.
Mattys, S. L., et al. (2005). Integration of multiple speech segmentation cues: A hierarchical framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 477-500.
Rodd, J. M. (2018). Lexical ambiguity. In S.-A. Rueschemeyer & M. G. Gaskell (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 120-144). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Spinelli, E., et al. (2010). An intonational cue to word segmentation in phonemically identical sequences. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 775-787.
Spinelli, E., et al. (2007). Fine-grained access to targets and competitors in phonemically identical spoken sequences: The case of French elision. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22(6), 828-859.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
