Speech rate and intelligibility of Arab Airlines’ safety instructions

Authors

  • Manal Aldhafeeri University of York, UK Author
  • Ghadi Alqahtani King Saud University, Saudi Arabia Author
  • Yahya Aldholmi King Saud University, Saudi Arabia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36505/ExLing-2022/13/0002/000544

Keywords:

Speech rate, Speech intelligibility, Noise, Safety instructions, Arab airlines

Abstract

We first analyzed and reported the speech rate (SR) of safety instructions (SIs) for nine Arab airlines, including Saudia, flynas, EgyptAir, and Oman Air. EgyptAir had the slowest SR and Oman Air the fastest, a statistically significant difference (Kruskal-Wallis, p < 0.001). We then assessed the impact of normal and accelerated (by 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20%) SR in passenger-boarding noise (-6 dB) on speech intelligibility evaluation. Listeners’ ratings demonstrated that intelligibility diminished to 48% at the original SR and to 7% at the 20% accelerated SR, and that SR was a statistically significant factor (repeated-measures Analysis of Variance, p < 0.01). Arab airlines are advised to consider this finding and consult the International Civil Aviation Organization on the recommended SR.

References

Adams, E. M., Moore, R. E. 2009. Effects of speech rate, background noise, and simulated hearing loss on speech rate judgment and speech intelligibility in young listeners. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 20(1), 028-039.

Aldholmi, Y., Alqahtani, A., Aldhafyan, R. 2021a. Teen production and perception of dialectal Arabic speech rate. In ExLing 2021, Athens, Greece, 13-16.

Aldholmi, Y., Aldhafyan, R., Alqahtani, A. 2021b. Perception of Standard Arabic synthetic speech rate. In Interspeech, 1704-1707.

Praat 2022. Boersma, P., Weenink, D. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program], version 6.2.15. Retrieved 14 March 2022 from http://www.praat.org/

Phonic 2022. Phonic – The Complete Toolkit for Unmoderated Research. Retrieved 13 March 2022 from https://www.phonic.ai

Quené, H. 2007. On the just noticeable difference for tempo in speech. Journal of Phonetics, 35(3), 353-362.

Rosenhouse, J., Kishon-Rabin, L. 2003. The effect of speech rate and noise on bilinguals' speech perception: The case of native speakers of Arabic in Israel. In Proceedings of the 8th Eurospeech, 2089-2092.

Rosenhouse, J., Haik, L., Kishon-Rabin, L. 2006. Speech perception in adverse listening conditions in Arabic-Hebrew bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism, 10(2), 119-135.

Sakamoto, S., Cui, Z., Miyashita, T., Morimoto, M., Suzuki, Y., Sato, H. 2018. Effects of inter-word pauses on speech intelligibility under long-path echo conditions. Applied Acoustics, 140, 263-274.

Tanaka, A., Sakamoto, S., Suzuki, Y. 2011. Effects of pause duration and speech rate on sentence intelligibility in younger and older adult listeners. Acoustical Science and Technology, 32(6), 264-267.

Nitta, H., Okazaki, H., Klinger, W., Kido, K. 2018. Speech speed rates of American air traffic controllers in communications with non-native English-speaking pilots. Studies in the Humanities, 103, 351-360.

Taylor, J. L., Yesavage, J. A., Morrow, D. G., Dolhert, N., Brooks III, J. O., Poon, L. W. 1994. The effects of information load and speech rate on younger and older aircraft pilots' ability to execute simulated air-traffic controller instructions. Journal of Gerontology, 49(5), P191-P200.

Vaane, E. 1982. Subjective estimation of speech rate. Phonetica, 39(2-3), 136-149.

Downloads

Published

01-10-2022

How to Cite

Speech rate and intelligibility of Arab Airlines’ safety instructions. (2022). Linguistic Proceedings Series, 13, 5-8. https://doi.org/10.36505/ExLing-2022/13/0002/000544

Share

Similar Articles

11-20 of 245

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.