Romanian children are not able not to derive actuality entailments

Authors

  • Simona Bilea University of Bucharest, Romania Author
  • Adina C. Bleotu University of Bucharest, Romania , Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Berlin, Germany Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36505/ExLing-2022/13/0008/000550

Keywords:

First language, Actuality entailments, Implicatures, Negation, DN

Abstract

Actuality entailments (AEs) are inferences from ability readings (“X could/was able to do Y”) to implicative readings (“X did Y”). They have been considered semantic inferences (Mari, Martin, 2007), arising from the speaker’s presupposition, or pragmatic implicatures (Bhatt 1999, Hacquard 2020) interacting with aspect. We investigate experimentally AEs and (double) negation in child Romanian. Like adults, Romanian 5-year-olds derive AEs with affirmative Minnie a putut să coacă o pizza (“Minnie was able to bake a pizza”), which suggests AEs are semantic in nature or pragmatic implicatures different from “some, not all”. Unlike adults, children derive few AEs with double negation in Minnie nu a putut să nu coacă o pizza (“Minnie was not able not to bake a pizza”).

References

Bhatt, R. 1999. Ability modals and their actuality entailments. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology / University of Pennsylvania.

Bleotu, A. C., Benz, A., Gotzner, N. 2021. Shadow-playing with Romanian 5-year-olds. Epistemic adverbs are a kind of magic! Experiments in Linguistic Meaning, 1, 59-70.

Hacquard, V. 2020. Actuality entailments. In Gutzmann, D., Matthewson, L., Meier, C., Rullmann, H., Zimmermann, T. E. (eds.), Companion to Semantics. Wiley.

Mari, A. 2015. Actuality entailments: When the modality is in the presupposition. In LACL 2016, volume 10054, 191-210.

Mari, A., Martin, F. 2007. Tense, abilities and actuality entailment. In Aloni, M., Dekker, P., Roelofsen, F. (eds.), Proceedings of the Sixteenth Amsterdam Colloquium, 151-157. Amsterdam: Palteam.

Noveck, I. 2001. When children are more logical than adults. Cognition, 78(2), 165-188.

Ozturk, O., Papafragou, A. 2015. The acquisition of epistemic modality: From semantic meaning to pragmatic interpretation. Language Learning and Development, 11(3), 191-214.

Stoicescu, I., Sevcenco, A., Avram, L. 2015. The acquisition of scalar implicatures in child Romanian. In Burada, M., Tatu, O. (eds.), Proceedings of Conference on British and American Studies, 141-155. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Stoicescu, I., Dressler, W. U. 2022. On the acquisition of semantic vs pragmatic telicity in child Romanian. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 33(2).

Tagliani, M. 2019. The acquisition of double negation in Italian. In Emonds, J., Janebová, M., Veselovská, L. (eds.), Proceedings of the Olomouc Linguistics Colloquium 2018, 99-115.

Thornton, R., Notley, A., Moscati, V., Crain, S. 2016. Two negations for the price of one. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 1(1), 45, 1-30.

Downloads

Published

01-10-2022

How to Cite

Romanian children are not able not to derive actuality entailments. (2022). Linguistic Proceedings Series, 13, 29-32. https://doi.org/10.36505/ExLing-2022/13/0008/000550

Share

Similar Articles

1-10 of 287

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.