Planning of active and passive voice in German

Authors

  • Judith Schlenter Department of Special Education and Rehabilitation, University of Cologne, Germany Author
  • Yulia Esaulova Department of Special Education and Rehabilitation, University of Cologne, Germany Author
  • Elyesa Seidel Department of Special Education and Rehabilitation, University of Cologne, Germany Author
  • Martina Penke Department of Special Education and Rehabilitation, University of Cologne, Germany Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36505/ExLing-2020/11/0043/000458

Keywords:

sentence production, eye tracking, passive voice, structural choice

Abstract

This eye-tracking experiment investigated how morphological case affects German speakers’ descriptions of transitive events, specifically whether explicit case marking modulates speakers’ structural choices. To increase the production of non-canonical structures (passive, patient-initial active), we primed patients in event scenes with a red dot. Subject and object case in German are unambiguously marked on masculine nouns but not on feminine nouns. If explicit case marking requires more structural planning, we should find an effect of gender. For feminine nouns, speakers may start with the cued patient and continue with a passive or a patient-initial active sentence. However, analyses of syntactic choice, speech onset times and eye gaze revealed that gender and thus case marking had no effect on sentence planning.

References

Esaulova, Y., Penke, M., Dolscheid, S. 2019. Describing events: Changes in eye movements and language production due to visual and conceptual properties of scenes. Frontiers in Psychology 10, 1–15.

Esaulova, Y., Penke, M., Dolscheid, S. 2020. Referent cueing, position, and animacy as accessibility factors in visually situated sentence production. Frontiers in Psychology 11, 1–13.

Gleitman, L., January, D., Nappa, R., Trueswell, J. 2007. On the give and take between event apprehension and utterance formulation. Journal of Memory and Language 57(4), 544–569.

Konopka, A. E., Meyer, A., Forest, T. A. 2018. Planning to speak in L1 and L2. Cognitive Psychology 102, 72–104.

Myachykov, A., Garrod, S., Scheepers, C. 2011. Perceptual priming of structural choice during English and Finnish sentence production. In Mishra R. K., Srinivasan, N. (eds.), Language-Cognition Interface, 53–71. Munich, Lincom.

R Core Team 2020. R: A language and environment for statistical learning (version 4.0.0). Retrieved from [https://www.R-project.org/](https://www.R-project.org/)

Tomlin, R., Myachykov, A. 2015. Attention and salience. In Dabrowska, E., Divjak, D. (eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, 31-52. Berlin, De Gruyter Mouton.

Downloads

Published

01-01-2020

How to Cite

Planning of active and passive voice in German. (2020). Linguistic Proceedings Series, 11(1), 173-176. https://doi.org/10.36505/ExLing-2020/11/0043/000458

Share

Similar Articles

1-10 of 213

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.