Topicalization out of English and Mandarin if-clauses and that-clauses
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36505/ExLing-2022/13/0032/000574Keywords:
Syntactic islands, Topicalization, Experimental syntax, Information structureAbstract
There are three main approaches to the (un)acceptability of long-distance dependencies (LDD): syntactic theories, processing theories, and discourse theories. Syntactic theories argue that constraints on LDD are universal and purely syntactic, predicting that these constraints should hold across languages and constructions. This study investigates the acceptability of topicalization from English and Mandarin if-clauses and that-clauses through a contextualised acceptability-judgement experiment. The findings reveal no adjunct island effect in either language, supporting the discourse approach, which argues that the discourse status of the extracted element within the construction is crucial. Specifically, the focus status of the extracted element depends on the construction itself. If there is a conflict between the focus status of the element and the construction, an acceptability penalty emerges.
References
Abeillé, A., Hemforth, B., Mao, R., Gibson, E. 2022. Acceptability of extraction out of English adjunct clauses: The role of topicalization. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference on Human Sentence Processing. University of California, Santa Cruz.
Abeillé, A., Winckel, E., Hemforth, B., Gibson, E. 2020. Extraction from subjects: Differences in acceptability depend on the discourse function of the construction. Cognition, 204.
Bondevik, I., Kush, D., Lohndal, T. 2021. Variation in adjunct islands: The case of Norwegian. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 44(3), 223-254.
Goldberg, A. E. 2013. Backgrounded constituents cannot be “extracted”. In Hornstein, N., Sprouse, J. (eds.), Experimental Syntax and Island Effects, 221-238. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gibson, E., Hemforth, B., Winckel, E., Abeillé, A. 2021. Acceptability of extractions out of adjuncts depends on discourse factors. In Proceedings of the 34th CUNY Conference. University of Pennsylvania.
Hofmeister, P., Sag, I. A. 2010. Cognitive constraints and island effects. Language, 86(2), 366-415.
Myers, J. 2012. Testing adjunct and conjunct island constraints in Chinese. Language and Linguistics, 13(3), 437-470.
Müller, C., Eggers, C. U. 2022. Island extractions in the wild: A corpus study of adjunct and relative clause islands in Danish and English. Languages, 7(2), 125-149.
Zenker, F., Schwartz, B. D. 2017. Topicalization from adjuncts in English vs. Chinese vs. Chinese-English interlanguage. In Proceedings of the 41st BUCLD Conference, 806-819. Boston University.
Xu, L., Langendoen, D. 1985. Topic structures in Chinese. Language, 61, 1-27.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
